| |
>>>>
1 | 2
| 3 |
4 |
5 | 6
| 7 | 8
III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
|
| A |
Criteria for Cathodic Protection:
A change of potential in the negative direction of -300mv
or more is one criteria for full cathodic protection.
|
| B |
Structure-to-Water Potentials:
The structure-to-water potentials after the coupling halves
and the bolt units were connected range from a low of -720mv
to a high of -810mv. This indicates that a high level of
cathodic protection has been achieved on the stainless steel
bolt units. The average potential shift of change in the
negative direction of stainless steel bolt units was 494mv.
This indicates that the stainless steel bolt units are receiving
a full level of cathodic protection from the couple with
the cast-iron coupling.
|
| C |
Inspection of Test Samples:
All test samples were inspected after testing and found to
have no visible corrosion attack of the stainless steel bolt
units. Through testing and inspection, it has been determine
that the MG Coupling, consisting of a cast-iron body and stainless
steel bolts, acts as a galvanic corrosion cell.
The stainless steel bolt units, being lower in electromotive
series, are cathodic to the cast-iron coupling halves making
the coupling the anode.
his type cathodic protection is considered sacrificial. The
anode (in this case the cast- iron coupling body) protects
the stainless steel bolt units. The cast-iron coupling body
is acting like the anode in the sacrificial system.
|
| D |
Conclusion:
It is concluded that due to the relative size differential
and potential difference between the coupling and stainless
steel bolt units, that the bolt units will be cathodically
protected and the resultant corrosion rate on the coupling
should be minimal. It is anticipated that the MG Coupling
will have a life expectancy as great or greater than that
of a pipe to which it is attached in the small soil environment. |